Friday, July 24, 2009

1st Portfolio Lending is the new name for Pineapple Lending




FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

1st Portfolio Lending is the new name for Pineapple Lending.

Tysons Corner, VA - July 22, 2009 – 1st Portfolio Holding Corporation’s mortgage lending subsidiary, Pineapple Lending has officially changed its name to 1st Portfolio Lending. Clients of the new 1st Portfolio Lending can expect all of the great service, customer care and thoughtful advice that the 1st Portfolio name has come to stand for.

1st Portfolio Lending specializes in conforming and FHA mortgages up to $729,750 as well as portfolio jumbo mortgages that are necessary for larger home purchases. The difficult housing and mortgage markets of today necessitate a high quality loan advisor like 1st Portfolio Lending to assist those that want to get the best possible loan and get their transaction completed. There may never have been a better time to refinance or purchase a new home than today. Interest rates remain artificially low because of massive, but temporary, purchases of mortgage backed securities by the Federal Reserve. Home prices also have fallen more than 30% from their 2006 peak.

For additional information on 1st Portfolio Lending or to discuss your potential mortgage loan needs, please contact Barbara Evans at 703.564.9100 or visit www.firstportfoliolending.com

Contact:
Barbara Evans
8300 Boone Blvd. Suite 200
Vienna, VA 22182
www.firstportfoliolending.com
Ph: 703-564-9100

###

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Losers are Winners and Winners are Losers

Why do individual investors typically under perform institutional investors? The answer lies in the chart below. Many individual investors chase returns - buying last years’ winners and selling off losers. After being burned in the stock market in 2008, these investors moved to bonds, cash and gold, last year’s top asset classes. I call this the Money Magazine strategy. Pick up Money Magazine in December and buy what they recommend. Then watch last years winners become this year’s losers as institutional investors reallocate assets. Next year’s Money will have a whole new set of losers to chase.

The top 3 asset classes on the Chart below have now moved to the bottom of the chart in the first 6 months of 2009. Last years losers are this year’s top performers as Emerging Markets and Growth oriented stocks out performed all other classes.
Show all

(click to enlarge)

Book Review: Outliers - The Story of Success

Outliers: The Story of Success
by Malcolm Gladwell
Malcolm Gladwell takes us on an intellectual journey through the world of "outliers"--the best and the brightest, the most famous and the most successful. He asks the question: what makes high-achievers different? His answer is that we pay too much attention to what successful people are like, and too little attention to where they are from: that is, their culture, their family, their generation, and the idiosyncratic experiences of their upbringing. Along the way he explains the secrets of software billionaires, what it takes to be a great soccer player, why Asians are good at math, and what made the Beatles the greatest rock band. -B&N

Book Review: The Ascent of Money

The Ascent of Money
by Niall Ferguson
With the clarity and verve for which he is known, Ferguson elucidates key financial institutions and concepts by showing where they came from. What is money? What do banks do? What’s the difference between a stock and a bond?

Perhaps most important, The Ascent of Money documents how a new financial revolution is propelling the world’s biggest countries, India and China, from poverty to wealth in the space of a single generation—an economic transformation unprecedented in human history.
-From jacket

Emerging Markets Offer Emerging Opportunities

Emerging Markets Offer Emerging Opportunities by Neil Macker

For many U.S.-based individual investors, emerging markets represent the “Wild West” of investing, offering unmatched and almost limitless returns. In the view of others, the term “emerging markets” invokes the specters of extreme risk and political instability. Most investors tend to either lump emerging markets into one large bucket or simply examine the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) markets. Financial pundits have recommended emerging markets as an asset class for hedging due to historically low correlation with the U.S. stock market. Let’s discuss these commonly held beliefs and why we still believe in the importance of an emerging markets allocation in your portfolio.

Wild West?
Until recently, many investors viewed emerging markets as a magical place that provided astronomical returns, driven by “China” and “commodities”. The idea that emerging markets can move upwards without large downward swings, though is hard to justify. Even before the events of 2008 the two largest, most diversified emerging markets (India and China) experienced wild swings in annual results as seen in Chart 1. Also, note that the S&P 500 outperformed the primary emerging market indices in only two of the nine years from 2000 to 2008. Both outperfomances occurred during recession years (2001 and 2008).



(click to enlarge)

Despite the large downward swings, the two primary emerging markets offer significantly higher average returns since January 2000. Table 1 shows what a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each index at the beginning of 2000 would have been worth as of June 30, 2009. Returns for both of the emerging market indices are more than three times that of the S&P 500.


(click to enlarge)

Even when we cherry pick the best four-year continuous sample for the S&P, the U.S. index provided lower returns as shown in Table 2.



(click to enlarge)

Frontier Markets vs. Maturing Developing Markets
The large swing in returns likely causes some investors to adopt the pessimistic view of emerging markets as pools of extreme risk and political instability. Part of this belief may lie in the inability of investors to segregate emerging markets. A simple method of separating emerging markets is to define a non-developed market as either a frontier market or maturing developing market.

Frontier markets include countries such as Bahrain, Bangladesh, Botswana, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Colombia, Cote D’Ivoire, Croatia, Ecuador, Estonia, Georgia, Ghana, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lithuania, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Qatar, Romania, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe. The equity exchanges in frontier markets feature undercapitalization and weaker regulatory frameworks along with lower levels of foreign ownership, borrowing, liquidity, and transparency than maturing developing markets. Most frontier markets also suffer from political instability, tenuous financial policies, and lesser- developed/diversified economies. Historically these countries have conformed to the pessimistic view of emerging markets and as such, most investors outside the most aggressive should stay clear of frontier markets.

Maturing developing markets include the big four BRIC markets along with familiar names such as Israel, Mexico, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey. Many investors have focused on the BRIC countries as those markets have benefited from investor in-flows and high GDP growth sparked by export growth (China and India) and commodity price increase (Russia and Brazil). However, the other markets also offer relative political stability, more diversified economies, larger domestic markets, lower levels of official/government corruption, and more robust ties to the developed countries.

Diversification, Not a Hedge
Ties to developed countries have in part led to the demise of the “de-coupling” theory, which stated that emerging markets had effectively moved far away from developed countries and would not be affected by a meltdown in the developed world. Some financial pundits advised that emerging market investments would act as a “hedge” against investments in developed markets. Even before the events of last year, the theory was already beginning to lose adherents as correlations between emerging market ETFs and the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) rose and as investment dollars began to flow in larger amounts into emerging market funds. After the global meltdown in 2008, where correlations among all asset classes increased, the idea of “de-coupling” faded as did the concept of hedging using asset classes.

The Future
So with no appreciable value as a hedge and increased risk, why allocate funds into emerging markets? While emerging market investments do not provide a strict hedge, the investments do offer diversification benefits as the correlations remain below one (at correlation of one, two assets classes would move in lockstep). Also, emerging markets provide access to different risk premia in the same way that an allocation to U.S. small and mid-cap stocks does despite the two sectors having a much higher correlation to each other than US equity and emerging markets. Another factor in favor of emerging markets is higher GDP growth over the near future. The only two major economies, developing or otherwise, that are projected to have GDP growth in 2009 are China and India as seen in Chart 2. Projections for 2010 also predict that China and India will also have the largest GDP growth of 9% and 7% respectively, versus 6% for emerging markets and 1% for developed economies.


(click to enlarge)

Another reason to allocate to emerging markets is as the U.S. and most governments in the world inject funds into domestic economies, the level of public debt is projected to increase dramatically. As seen in Chart 3, the U.S. was in relatively decent standing with public debt at 40% of GDP at the end of 2008, but was well behind three of four BRIC countries. Current Congressional Budget Office projections estimate that the U.S. public debt to GDP will reach 51% at the end of 2009 and will peak at 54% in 2011. These projections reflect the belief that the government will move back towards a more balanced budget versus the $1.5 trillion deficit projected for 2009. Some commentators such as Bill Gross of PIMCO, suggest that the U.S. government may have to continue running trillion dollar deficits over the next several years and that the new “normal” GDP growth rate will be 1% to 2% versus the 3%+ of the past.


(click to enlarge)

As the U.S. and other developed countries increase overall debt levels, their corresponding stock markets will experience increased risk levels with lower expected returns. As a result, emerging markets may provide greater risk/return rewards.
Given these factors, we continue to believe that allocation to emerging markets is appropriate for many clients. The amount allocated to emerging markets will vary by portfolio given individual risk tolerances/time horizons and will change over time as we continue to monitor the economic factors.

Stocks Rebound Strong, But Will it Continue?

The Second Quarter of 2009 most likely marked the beginning of the next bull market and the first increase in the stock market since 2007. US stocks, as measured by the S&P 500, were up nearly 16% for the quarter and up nearly 37% since the market low on March 9th. However, it will take three more rallies of this amount to regain the market peak reached in 2007. 

While we may be nearing the end of this recession, don’t expect things to get back to “normal” quickly. The US and international developed markets are likely to grow much more slowly in the coming years than over the past decade. Aging populations, increasing savings rates, high unemployment rates and the deleveraging of both corporations and individuals are likely to keep GDP (Gross Domestic Product) growth lower than during previous recoveries. In addition, the massive debt piled up by the US along with likely higher taxes in the future will slow growth for the foreseeable horizon.

With a slower U.S. economy, the U.S. stock market is likely to advance at a slower pace than in the recent past. From 1990 to 2007, GDP grew at an average rate of 2.8%. During the same period, the S&P 500 expanded at an annual rate of 7.5%, a 4.7% premium over GDP. If the average GDP growth for next several years falls between 1% and 2% as predicted by some observers including PIMCO’s Bill Gross, expect average US stock market returns to average only 5.5% to 6.5% in the coming years.

However, significant growth in US companies may occur in particular sectors. These sectors are likely to be the industrial sector, high tech, renewable energy and clean technologies, natural resources and the beaten down financial services. Internationally, we expect emerging market countries to continue to outperform developed markets.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Money For Nothing and a Mortgage for Free



The US government is spending trillions of dollars to keep our ailing economy afloat. This has already softened the free fall in the equity markets and hopefully we will see it in our housing markets. But it comes at a cost, which is the likelihood of higher taxes and inflation in the future.

My friend Tom Millon, a secondary mortgage market specialist in the U.S. mortgage business, says it this way in his recent newsletter, "Never fear. We have a new put option protecting us. Remember the Greenspan put? That's the one that protected the stock market in the late 'Nineties. It was always safe to buy stocks because Greenspan would lower rates to support stocks every time they dipped. Today we have the Obama-Bernanke-Geithner put option." The new put option Tom is referring to is government subsidized mortgages. Our government is using printing money to buy mortgage back securities, which has pushed mortgage rates down to an artificially low price. This free money is being offered to you or anyone else to go spend on a new house or refinance your existing one. Everyone in the country who can afford to buy a house or refinance must take advantage of this "put option". It is basically free money and will not last!

The downside of this government generosity is it debases our currency and increases our debt. There are no free lunches and it may unleash inflation. Imagine a future with inflation above 5% and interest rates above 8%. Your house will be going up at this time and you will have locked your mortgage at 5% or below! There is no better way to protect yourself, except maybe moving to a Latin American Country, from the pain that is yet to come! Pay down your loan if necessary to qualify. Conforming loans are now up to $729,000.

1st Portfolio recently purchased a mortgage company, previously known as Pineapple Lending, now called 1st Portfolio Lending. Please give us a call so that we can analyze your personal financial circumstances and help you save on a new home mortgage. If you mention this newsletter, we will provide you with a $250 closing cost credit to reduce your expense.

Monday, March 9, 2009

A Light at the End of a Long Tunnel


A year ago I began writing this article, but concluded that the “light at the end of the tunnel” was a train. Again last summer I set pen to paper on the same theme and came to the same conclusion. I tried in December and failed. As I write, I wonder that it might be a little too soon to release this. I was early when I wrote my article in April of 2005 entitled Bubble Trouble, calling for a major drop in real estate prices and I may be a bit early in suggesting we may be very close to a bottom in home real estate values.

There are still significant forces putting downward pressure on real estate values. These include the insane run up in values over the first 6 years of this decade; very tight credit markets; increasing unemployment; record foreclosures; excess capacity; and general market fear.

However, many of these forces may increasingly be “priced in” and are being replaced by positive forces that may create a real estate bottom in the coming months. These positive forces include the precipitous drop in prices from market peaks creating greater affordability; record low interest rates, a record drop in new home starts; the near trillion dollar stimulus plan; the $8,000 first time homebuyer tax credit; and the increases in the FHA and Conforming loan limits for both purchases and refinance transactions. Let us first take a look at where we are now before we dive into where we might be headed.

Falling off a Cliff
At the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), where many financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, currencies contracts, and commodities are traded, options and futures on residential real estate also are available. These products are based on the most accurate real estate index available on the market, the S&P/Case-Schiller U.S. National Home Price Index. This measure is generally considered the best and most unbiased indicator of real estate prices. The index is calculated from data on repeat sales of single family homes, an approach developed by Yale economists Karl Case and Robert Schiller. The index is normalized to a value of 100 in the first quarter of 2000 and measures home values in the 20 largest US metropolitan markets or MSAs.


According to the Case-Shiller Index, average U.S. single family housing values peaked in the summer of 2006 (July to be specific) doubling in value since January of 2000. Since that peak, housing prices nationwide have fallen off a cliff, dropping about 30% on average. This drop varies significantly in the 20 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) listed. For example, in Charlotte, North Carolina, home prices fell just 4% compared to Phoenix, Arizona where prices fell 45%. Coincidently, Bank of America, BB&T and Wachovia are all based in North Carolina. Maybe this explains why these banks were willing to make such aggressive bets in the residential mortgage market.


Forces Pushing Prices Down
In Real Estate Finance class, students generally are taught to assume a 3% appreciation rate for real estate growth in all financial calculations. This was always considered to be the historical long term rate of growth. For some reason, the rating agencies and large brokerage houses missed this in their Real Estate Finance class. Home values appreciated at a rate of about 14% per year from 2000 to 2006 due to low rates, easy credit and speculation. Assuming values revert back to the mean of 3% per year, we may still have a ways to go. Using the Case-Schiller Index values from 20 years ago in 1989, and projecting forward appreciation of 3% per year, average real estate values nationwide must fall another 9% from their year-end values before they reach a 3% year over year appreciation rate. While this is a big number, home values fell 6% in the forth quarter of 2008 alone. Thus it would not be a much of a stretch to see a 9% drop by summer.

Tight Credit Hurts
Tighter credit standards are hurting home buyers. Conventional and FHA loan standards have tightened dramatically. In addition, many of the mortgage products available to home buyers have vanished. No income verification loans, so called 80-20 loans, sub-prime loans and even competitivly priced jumbo products are no longer in existence. This means that few potential buyers can pick up the slack of excess homes.

Unemployment Continues to Increase
The unemployment rate, currently at 8.1%, is expected to continue to rise throughout this year and into next year. The Fed is projecting a rate of 8.8% by the end of 2009 and possibly higher in 2010. Unemployment has a direct impact on housing prices. As people lose jobs, they lose their ability to make house payments, and many lose their homes in foreclosure. Unemployment can be devastating to housing markets, but is a lagging indicator of economic activity and is likely to remain high well after the economy starts to grow.

(click to enlarge graph)

Delinquency Rates Increased in Q4 but Foreclosures Rates Began to Drop
The Federal Reserve reported that fourth quarter 2008 mortgage delinquency stood at 6.29% up from 5.2% in the third quarter. Mortgage delinquency is generally below 2% under normal market conditions. “Foreclosure filings were reported on 274,399 U.S. properties during the month of January, a 10 percent decrease from the previous month but still up 18 percent from January 2008” according to the RealtyTrac U.S. Foreclosure Market Report.



“The extensive foreclosure efforts on the part of lenders and government agencies appear to have impacted the January” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac.


“January REOs, which represent completed foreclosure sales to the foreclosing lender, were down 15 percent nationwide from the previous month.


Excess Capacity
Total housing inventory peaked in November at an 11.2-month supply meaning that it would take 11 months before all of the homes listed were sold at the current rate of absorption. However, at the end of December, this figure fell to a 9.3-months supply due to a substantial increase in home sales. “The higher monthly sales gain and falling inventory are steps in the right direction,” according to Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors, “but the market is still far from normal balanced conditions.”

General Market Fear and the Herd Mentality
The same factors that pushed housing up to insane levels are now pushing it down at an even faster rate. In 2006, buyers were willing to enter bidding wars and in some cases write “escalator” clauses to compete against as many as 20 or more purchasers on the same property. Today, fear of further price deterioration has kept renters from buying, which in turn stops the move up buyer from moving up the chain. I call this the “Herd Mentality”. It is what creates all bubbles and eventually busts.

(click to enlarge)

Now for Some Good News
Ok, enough of the bad news, lets look at the positive factors that may be establishing a floor in housing. Why is this important? I believe that the fall in housing prices led us into this recession and a floor in prices will spark the end of the recession.

Affordability
The National Association of Realtors, biased though they may be, reports that their Housing Affordability Index is at 135, which means that the average American family can not only afford to purchase a home, but also will have excess money for living expenses. According to the association, a score of 100 indicates that a typical family would have the exact amount required based on a 20% down payment and monthly payments of no more than 25% of their household income.

I did my own calculations based on Fairfax County’s numbers. For the past few years, an average Fairfax County couple earning the median household income of $105,000 per year could not even afford to purchase a home in Fairfax County. Now that prices have fallen 30% from 2006, a home that used to cost $600,000 now costs $420,000. Using the a conventional loan limit of $417,000 or the new higher FHA loan limits of $729,750, this couple can now purchase this home with 10% down with a conventional loan or as little as 3.5% down at a rate near 5%. Add Obama’s $8,000 first time home buyer tax credit and things get even better. These first time home buyers are the key to the real estate chain. As they buy new and existing homes, existing owners are free to sell their homes and possibly move up. This is a huge step to establishing a floor on real estate values.

Record Low Rates and New HUD and FNMA Guidelines
As of February 26th 2009, the national average mortgage rate is 5.07% with an average of ¾ of a point according to Freddie Mac’s Primary Mortgage Market Survey. This rate is near all time lows and allows buyers to afford significantly more house for the money. For example, mortgage rates were approximately 8% in the year 2000. In that year, the Case-Schiller Composite 20 Index was set at base of 100. Today the index stands at 152 showing a 52% increase in home values from the year 2000. Should homes be worth 52% more today than in 2000?


Considering real income are the same today as in 2000 and the population has grown by less than the number of new homes built, not likely. But if rates were at the same level as they are today, then home buyers can afford a 35% larger purchase price. This has a direct correlation on home values. This would put the index at 135 vs. 152 where it stands today. Combine that with the new max FHA insured loan amount of $729,750 and the more lenient FNMA guidelines on refinance transactions indicates that we may be approaching the bottom.

Record Drop in New Home Starts
According to Bloomberg, “U.S. builders broke ground in January on the fewest houses on record as a lack of credit and plunging sales exacerbated the worst real-estate slump since the Great Depression. Housing starts plunged 17 percent.” While this may seem like bad news it has a very positive impact on future home inventories. Eventually the demand for housing will exceed supply again and home prices will begin to recover. This may take some time but a virtually moratorium on new homes certainly helps.

Government Stimulation
Over the next two years our government will spend nearly a trillion dollars stimulating our battered economy. While one can debate the value of this stimulus, there is little debate that it will have a positive impact on stemming foreclosures, increasing employment, and providing prospective purchasers a nice credit of $8,000 to purchase a home in 2009. The administration will also use $75 billion to bring down mortgage rates and encourage loan modifications to stem repossessions. “The problem with the build-up in inventory is coming from the increasing number of foreclosures,” Nicolas Retsinas, director of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies in Cambridge, Massachusetts, said in a Bloomberg Television interview. “It’s about time the government intervened so directly in the problem.”

So Where Does This Leave Us?
As I explained earlier, falling real estate values led us into this recession and stabilizing values will mark the beginning of the end. If one can accurately predict when and at what level home values will stop falling, one can predict when the stock market will likely turn positive and when the economy will truly begin to rebound. We live in a world of uncertainty, and it is this uncertainty that defines risk and ultimately opportunity or failure. Predictions on when the real estate market might begin cannot be relied upon at all. There are far too many factors that are still unknown. However, now that I have hedged myself, here is a summary of my thoughts on the light at the end of the tunnel.


A bottom in the current residential real estate cycle will be reached between April and September of this year at a value of 11 to 15% below year end 2008 values. While an additional drop of this magnitude will be painful, it will be reached shortly. Capitulation caused by short sellers and foreclosures will likely end this spring. Thus some of the best buying opportunities may be right around the corner. If my predictions are correct, this would mean a peak to trough decrease in values of about 37% and put properties priced at their 2002 levels. These estimates are based on national averages and will vary significantly in different parts of the country and in different price points in each MSA. For example, property values inside the Washington DC Capital Beltway have fallen by less than half that of those further out. So if you are in the market for a home and plan to stay at least 5 years, 2009 might just turn out to be the ideal time to buy.

Do Your Part To Help Economy

Do Your Part To Help Economy: Take Some of the Government Hand Outs, Lower Your Mortgage Payments or Buy a New House.

Our government is giving away tax dollars in an effort to stop home depreciation and help the economy. Here is a summary of how to get some of these tax dollars in your pocket while helping the faltering economy. Falling real estate values are killing the Nation’s financial institutions, not to mention damaging the stock market and to the equity in your home. Take advantage of the $787 Billion Stimulus Package and the $75 Billion Treasury’s “Making Home Affordable” Programs and help stop the bleeding. Here is a quick summary of how you can help:

1. Refinance Now: The US Treasury has been buying mortgage backed securities at an unprecedented rate. This has lowered fixed mortgage rates to the low 5% range. This, combined with the new, higher loan limits of $625,000 has helped many to lower their mortgage payments. If your loan amount exceeds $625,000 or if you are over 80% loan to value, consider paying down the mortgage to meet the lender’s guidelines. Remember, if you reduce debt costing you 6%, you are guaranteed to earn that rate of interest on your investment.

2. Get your first time homebuyer $8000 tax credit[1] when you buy a home before December 1st 2009. A “first time home buyer” is anyone who has not owned a home for three years. If you plan to buy before the deadline, you can begin saving by reducing your withholdings now. The law also allows taxpayers to choose ("elect") to treat qualified home purchases in 2009 as if the purchase occurred on December 31, 2008. This means that the 2008 income limit (MAGI) applies and the election accelerates and can be applied by filing 2008 returns instead of for 2009 returns. Income must be lower than $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for couples. If you already own a home and have a twenty something year-old living in your house, give them a push! Now is the time to pick up a steal!

3. The Home Affordable Refinance[2]: This program will be available to 4 to 5 million homeowners who have a solid payment history on an existing mortgage owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. This program is aimed at homeowners whose loan to value is greater than 80% and do not qualify for a traditional refinance. These borrowers may be eligible to refinance their loan and take advantage of today’s lower mortgage rates or to refinance an adjustable-rate mortgage into a more stable mortgage, such as a 30-year fixed rate loan. The Home Affordable Refinance program ends in June 2010. Only homeowners in good standing whose loans are held by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac qualify. The property must be owner-occupied and the borrower must have enough income to make payments on the new mortgage debt. Borrowers can't owe more than 105 percent of their home's current value on their first mortgage. Borrowers with a second mortgage still can qualify as long as their first mortgage isn't more than 105 percent of their home's value. Homeowners can't take cash out during the refinancing to pay other debt.

4. The Home Affordable Modification[3]: This program will help up to 3 to 4 million at-risk homeowners avoid foreclosure by reducing monthly mortgage payments. Who can qualify? The program applies to mortgages made on Jan. 1 or earlier. If your mortgage payment including taxes, insurance and homeowners association dues exceeds 31 percent of your gross monthly income you may qualify for modification. The property must be the homeowner's primary residence. Home loans for single-family properties that are worth more than $759,750 don't qualify. Homeowners are eligible for up to $1,000 of principal reduction payments each year for up to five years! You do not need to be behind on your mortgage to qualify for this program.

5. Mortgage Analysis: Need help to figure it out? Call for a free mortgage analysis. 703-821-5554



[1] http://www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com/
[2] http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/reports/guidelines_summary.pdf
[3] http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/reports/guidelines_summary.pdf

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Obama Signs Economic Stimulus Package into Law

Here is a great summary of how the stimulus package might effect your taxes:



On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which contains nearly $800 million in economic stimulus spending and tax relief designed to help individuals and businesses in the current economic climate. While the tax and accounting specialists at Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. (CB&H) review the Act to develop more detailed guidance for our clients and friends, here is a list of some of the new law's major provisions. Note that most of the benefits included in the new law are eliminated or phased out for higher income individuals; however, there is something for virtually everyone in this Act:

"Making Work Pay" Tax Credit
For 2009 and 2010, the Act creates a refundable tax credit of up to $400 for working individuals or $800 for couples with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) that does not exceed $75,000 or $150,000 respectively. Qualified taxpayers will receive this credit either in the form of reduced withholding from their paychecks during the year or when they file their annual tax returns.

AMT Patch for 2009
The Act includes an alternative minimum tax (AMT) patch for 2009, which raises AMT exemption amounts above 2008 levels to $70,950 for joint filers and surviving spouses (up from $69,950 in 2008); and $46,700 for single filers and heads of households (up from $46,200).

First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
The Act expands the first-time homebuyer tax credit, originally enacted under the Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008, increasing the maximum amount of the credit to $8,000 and eliminating the repayment obligation for qualified principal residences purchased from January 1, 2009 through November 30, 2009.

New Car Deduction
Effective for new vehicle purchases on or after February 17, 2009, the Act allows qualified taxpayers an above-the-line deduction for all state, local sales and excise taxes paid relating to the first $49,500 of the purchase price of a new car, light truck or other vehicle through the end of the year.

"American Opportunity" Education Tax Credit
For 2009 and 2010, the Act expands and renames the existing HOPE education credit, increasing the credit amount (subject to income limits) from $1,800 to $2,500 a year and applying the credit to all four years of college. The Act also makes 40% of the credit refundable and adds course materials as qualifying expenses.

Bonus Depreciation
The Act extends the first-year 50% bonus depreciation enacted under the 2008 Economic Stimulus Act for new business equipment purchases through December 31, 2009. The Act also extends through 2010 bonus depreciation for other qualified property.

Section 179 Expensing
The Act extends through 2009 the Section 179 depreciation deduction, originally enacted under the 2008 Economic Stimulus Act, for new and used business equipment, increasing the expensing amount to $250,000 and the threshold for reducing the deduction to $800,000.

Net Operating Loss Carryback
The Act enables qualified small business with average gross receipts of $15 million or less to carry net operating losses (NOLs) back for up to five years. The carryback provision applies to any NOL for tax years beginning or ending in 2008.

Cancellation of Indebtedness
The Act allows qualified businesses to recognize cancellation of indebtedness income over five years, beginning in 2014, for specified types of business debt repurchased or forgiven by the business after December 31, 2008, and before January 1, 2011.

Qualified Small Business Stock
The Act allows investors to exclude, through 2010, up to 75% of the gain from the sale of qualified small business stock acquired after February 17, 2009 and before January 1, 2011 and held for more than five years.

S Corp Built-In Gain Period
For C corps that become S corps in 2009 and 2010, the Act reduces the holding period to seven from 10 years for assets subject to the built-in gains tax.
This short summary is by no means a comprehensive review of the new law. Look for more details soon about how these and other provisions of the Act may provide you and your business with considerable opportunities to maximize tax savings, or contact your local CB&H tax professional today to ensure that you and your business receive the maximum possible benefit of these provisions.

FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:Brooks Nelson, Partner bnelson@cbh.com 1.800.849.8281

About Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. (CB&H) www.cbh.comAs the Southeast’s accounting and consulting Firm of Choice, Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. (CB&H) is uniquely positioned to provide quality, cost-effective and value-added services to a diverse and successful client base. The Firm sets itself apart by delivering the extensive industry specialization and service opportunities of a national firm, but with the accessibility, service continuity and level of personal relationship expected from a local business. Ranked nationally among CPA firms, CB&H’s resource network stretches regionally across six states, including the large metro markets of Atlanta, Charlotte, Hampton Roads, Raleigh, Richmond, Tampa, South Florida, and Washington D.C., and nationally and internationally through an alliance with Baker Tilly International, a worldwide network of independent accounting firms.

U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230 Disclosure: In accordance with applicable professional regulations, please understand that, unless specifically stated otherwise, any written advice contained in, forwarded with, or attached to this communication is not a tax opinion and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of (i) avoiding any penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue code or applicable state or local law provisions or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

Source: Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P. (CB&H)